Steve Langasek wrote: > > Native packages do get binNMUed; anna was recently binNMUed on several archs > in response to the ldbl symbol skew, so there are now 1.27+b1 packages in > the archive for alpha, powerpc, s390, and sparc. So no dash being added to > the version number, as none is needed, and in any case the binNMU handling > that was spec'ed out wouldn't recognize a package as a binNMU if there were > anything more than '+b<n>' added to the sourceful version number. > (Although, 1.27+b1 sorts after 1.27-0.1, so you can't NMU a native package > with this version scheme that has previously been binNMUed...) > I suggest to use +nmu1, this would solve most of the problems. +nmu1 is greater than +b1 and it can be used for native and non-native packages.
The policy should mention NMUs. -- Julian Andres Klode IRC Nickname: juliank (Debian/OFTC + Freenode, GimpNet) Fellow of FSFE: https://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/jak (No. 1049) Debian Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode Ubuntu Wiki: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/JulianAndresKlode In Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~juliank My packages: http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Languages: German, English, [bit French]
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
