Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:40:40AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
>> Wouldn't this be a better solution then getting rid of the UMich >> library? > Yes. Why? Could you explain what the UMich indirection library practically adds for our users? Why would we want to continue using it rather than linking directly against an appropriate GSSAPI implementation? Also, since it was the UMich library that took over a library name that was already in use by Heimdal, if we're going to be renaming upstream libraries (which I think is a little dubious), which library to rename is pretty obvious to me, and it's not the Heimdal one. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
