David Lopez Zajara (Er_Maqui <er_maqui <at> darkbolt.net> writes:
> .. > I doesn't have more for this, but a comment: > > I've read on this thread, on a critical for audacious "as xmms > replacement", I've pointed who audacious doesn't have many features > present on xmms. Hello everyone, I'm a regular Debian user, and I have followed this rather intense discussion about the removal of Xmms, and like to add two things: First of all, I think Audacious is really good and mature enough to replace Xmms. I have been using Xmms until some weeks ago, when I first read this discussion. Then I gave Audacious a try, and I like it even better then Xmms, and I think I am rather picky. I use Debian testing, and I think all stories about millions of huge bugs in Audacious are exaggerated. Audacious looks much better (partly because it uses the newer gtk I think), text is much better readable and from what I see it is at least evenly configurable. It also has quite some plugins available. Second, from my point of view, Xmms is unmaintained upstream. There's no active community that is improving Xmms, the site is rather dead and the previous mentioned list of 'future improvements' has not been updated for at least three years, see http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.xmms.org/next_version.php . Periodically, something does change, but it cannot be considered as maintaining IMHO. So what I'm saying; I would understand the removal of Xmms. Regards, Andre Offringa -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
