Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Yes, I never thought we were about to remove the fact that /bin/sh was > a symlink that the user could be able to change whenever he wants. I > don't think debconf questions or alike are wise FWIW though. > > In fact what happens currently with bash/dash is fine, just with > /bin/sh being dash instead of bash for new installations.
dash already uses debconf to manage the /bin/sh symlink. It has since 2002, so I don't know what your concern is with using debconf there. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
