On Monday 30 July 2007 00:15, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:09:11PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > If you go to http://bugs.debian.org/hpodder, you will see under the > > outstanding bugs section, several bugs that have been closed for some > > time. These bugs remain closed (were not reopened), the BTS page for each > > bug knows about that, yet they are still listed under the "outstanding > > bugs" section. Why is that? > > > > Examples are #389956, #410630, #419471. > > thank hurd-i386 for this. (or any arch where your package does not > build). I wish the bts would ignore non RC archs by default :| > > IOW: always add arch=i386 or arch=amd64 in the request URL, else > you'll end up with an unusable list of bugs all the time.
Or delete "dist=...". Then bugs that are fixed in *some* version are all
categorised as resolved, I think (which I think is usually adequate).
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
pgpNYMDBvuwIb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
