Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > bzr is an inplementation of Arch, and there are people who have not > bought the 'Bazaar VCS Project' koolaid, and still prefer Arch to > the new VCS.
'bzr' is not an implementation of Arch. At best, it is strongly inspired by work the developers did on 'baz', which *was* an implementation of Arch. With the 'bzrtools' package installed, it's (sometimes) possible to do a one-way import of existing 'baz' branches or repositories. That's useful for those who know they're transitioning to an entirely new VCS, and want to do so. > Robert Collins wrote: > > * Create a 'bazaar' package which is a metapackage depending on bzr, > > recommending key plugins, and suggesting others. > > This would be a bug. While I understand you prefer the bzr VCS > over Arch, I see no justification for imposing your likes and dislikes > over users happily using baz as their version control system. I agree; the older 'baz' VCS is what currently gets installed with the 'bazaar' package, and the 'bzr' VCS is not a compatible replacement. -- \ "Members of the general public commonly find copyright rules | `\ implausible, and simply disbelieve them." -- Jessica Litman, | _o__) _Digital Copyright_ | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
