On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 11:31:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 14 July 2007 22:57, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > <fjp> vorlon: Any opinion on #433119? As it is now, this would affect > > > testing too as soon as nfs-utils is old enough. > > > <vorlon> fjp: get the release team to block the package until > > > sysvinit is fixed?
> > Ahem, "RW". If you must resort to invoking me in an appeal to > > authority, please use accurate citations. :) (I.e., I neither added > > such a block, nor declared this to be an RC bug on nfs-utils; I have no > > more authority over lenny than you or any other developer.) > Sorry, I don't understand. AFAIK the quotation is 100% accurate, unless > you were replying to a different comment from me. You prefaced that quote with > it would seem that RM agrees that this is an RC issue: and I'm not an RM. > The only thing that may be wrong is my interpretation of your comment. I > took it to mean that you agreed the issue was serious enough to be > considered RC and that the release team [1] would consider a request to > block this new version of nfs-utils from migrating if it were made. > I don't think I ever implied that you actually set such a block. > [1] I do hope that the RW sill is a member of the release team and also > RM also stands for "Release Management" or "Release Managers", especially > when used without article... Uh, to my knowledge RM has never stood for "Release Management" in a Debian context. So if that's what you meant, ok, but I don't think that was clear to the audience (and it wasn't clear to me). Sure, a request to block nfs-utils from migrating would be considered; and yes, I'm still part of the release team, and my opinions tend to align with those of the RMs; but I don't speak for them. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
