On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:46:45AM +0200, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote:
> I really hate circular depency and I'm not sure it's the better way. In > fact, audacious is broken in testing for ages and forcing a build of mcs > on mipsel would fix all that crap... I wonder why audacious and audacious-plugins should be separate packages at all instead of building them into a single binary package, given that this circular dependency relationship exists (even if not on paper currently). But at a minimum, yes, the audacious-plugins package should be depending on libaudacious by way of shlibdeps. That won't prevent all broken combinations of coinstallable packages, but it would have prevented the current broken combination within testing. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
