Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Heh, I was very much in favor of Homepage as a debian/control field; my > objections to this use of Build-Options is not to the addition of this > field (which also has other benefits), but to this particular use of it > to declare information that must also be represented elsewhere in the > package.
Yeah, I just saw your other message, and that does make sense, but I don't trust make's ability to tell you what targets are available in the presence of all the complex makefile tricks that Debian packages do. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
