Robert Collins writes ("RFC: declaritive diversions"): > I don't have a proposed syntax at this point, but I was thinking a > control file in the source such as debian/PACKAGENAME.diversions would > be a good starting point - if thats able to record everything thats > needed, even if the binaries stay as they are (doing diversions in the > maintainer scripts) for now for compatibility this would improve things.
Ideally the setup should allow the same packages to declare diversions both ways. This would make the transition a lot easier. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]