On Tue, July 3, 2007 8:38 am, Andreas Barth wrote: > Explain it in debian/copyright, that's the proper place (the source > files don't actually need license statement, even though of course it > helps transparence and is therefore encouraged).
I didn't realise that. I had assumed that each source file *had* to have a license declaration in it. So if the source files do not have license declarations, we are still OK if there is a "COPYING" (or similar) file in the tarball? What about if there is no such file but there is an explicit license declaration on upstream's web site? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
