Le Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:13:45PM +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > > Now to the core: > > A package cons that ships /usr/bin/cons and a package pscan that ships > /usr/bin/pscan makes sense and these binaries and project names exist for a > long time. Why do you think a rename of the files /usr/bin/cons and > /usr/bin/pscan in emboss is out of the question?
Hi, Nowhere I have written that I will not rename the binaries from EMBOSS. Indeed, I will move them to /usr/lib/emboss and document in the README how to access them. However, in the process of solving that problem, I found two unmaintained pacages. One has already been orphaned by others, and its maintainer seems OK with this since he did not react. I am just asking if it is OK if I orphan pscan for the same reason, expecting that it will remove a burden for its maintainer. Hope that explains, -- Charles Plessy http://charles.plessy.org Wako, Saitama, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
