Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22/06/07 at 11:27 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: >> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Colin Tuckley wrote: >> >> Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> >> >> >> > You will receive a mail: >> >> > * if one of your packages has RC bugs older than 30 days in unstable >> >> >> >> You need to check the "new" queue for an upload before sending a mail in >> >> this case. It ought not to be really necessary, but stuff gets stuck in >> >> new >> >> for quite a while sometimes. >> > >> > No, you should tag your bugs pending and Lucas ought to ignore pending >> > bugs (maybe he already does). >> >> Hm, but there a couple of bugs tagged "pending" which don't get an >> upload for months. Even RC ones, as I remember from the etch release >> cycle. And the kind of maintainer who does these things is the ideal >> target for these e-mails... [...] > So I think that I'll just ignore NEW for now. But if I get many replies > about that, I will reconsider that of course.
As long as you don't treat "pending" as a reason for not sending the mail, I'm fine with that. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
