On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:45:17PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Anyway, before we get lost in all this prediction stuff, I'm yet to hear
> > a good reason why we need complete triviality in the access method, as
> > opposed to the kind of triviality we have had for years now: all that is
> > necessary to get webwml access is to send a mail to debian-www saying
> > you've read some docs and you want access.
>
> I don't have a good reason, but for me it's the difference between
> contributing or not. If I already have access and I get an itch, I will
> scratch it. If I don't, I will either forget about it or complain. I
> am unlikely to go through whatever bureaucracy is set up to request
> access. Whether or not this is a loss for debian-www is not something I
> feel comfortable asserting.
This sounds a bit extreme. Would you at least be patient enough to file
a bug report or send an e-mail about the issue?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
