On Thu, 24 May 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Please stop the choice-of-law bullshit. This clause is moot, we can > ignore it.
The problem is not the choice-of-law, but the choice-of-venue clause, as you yourself indicated in.[1] I don't know why it has yet to be removed by Sun, but we were told that that (or relicensing of works under GPLv2/3) was in progress a year ago. In any event, this has been rather laboriously discussed previously in threads about the CDDL[2,3,4], so I'll stop here. Don Armstrong 1: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/12/msg00002.html 2: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00056.html 3: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00075.html 4: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00893.html -- Build a fire for a man, an he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. -- Jules Bean http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
