Why build-depending on package from testing would be an RC bug?
2007/5/8, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:08:30AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: > Could you explain what you mean? My package is built with libtool > 2.1a(without dependency on its package) and it went to etch long time > ago. I > don't understand why do you want to fill RC bugs for such packages. I didn't say that I did, I said that *build-depending* on the package would be an RC bug. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ > 2007/5/7, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:19:33PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Mike Hommey: > > > >> > Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ? > > > >> It would be impossible to build-depend on it. This may or may not be > >> a good thing. > > > >I don't imagine libtool-cvs is a target for inclusion in lenny, which > >means > >any package build-depending on it would have an RC bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- .''`. Piotr Roszatycki : :' : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `-
