On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 10:00:48AM -0400, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:38:39AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:30AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: > > > On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote: > > > > Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins, > > > > beryl-settings and emerald [1] and not ready (yet) beryl. > > > > > > Firstly, the beryl packages were REJECTED because of license issues. > > > Upstream > > > is working with me on resolving the non-free/license issues that remain > > > these > > > will be fixed for the 0.2.0 stable release of Beryl (coming soon). > > > > >From their homepage: > > Mar 14: 0.2.0 Released > > > > But they also already have 0.2.1 versions available. > > If someone wants to work on Beryl and help us out, that'd be great. Shawn > seems to have gotten frustrated with the project, and I've been looking to > recruit someone to work on it.
Is it really worth working on beryl when they are merging with compiz ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
