On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:53:58PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > "Margarita Manterola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The only thing that worries me a bit is that this prevents any 4.22.x > > future upstream version. I guess that an epoch would be need in that > > case. (4.22.3 already prevented any upstream version in 4.22.[123]). > > Yes, therefore an epoch would be needed anyway should a 4.22.x version > be released.
You could use "4.22..x-1" for that version, as a workaround. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
