On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:10:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Like I said, in practical terms, if a bug like this in a major server > package goes unnoticed until 3 days before the release, we are not actually > "supporting" 486. We support the i386 architecture quite well, but it seems > only honest to admit that as a project, we don't care about 486 enough to > even get 486-specific problems marked as RC in time to do anything about > them for a release. >
That could be fixed in R1, isn't it? I see no major problems on those regards... -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
