On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:11:23PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I share the feeling of "niceness" of the personal touch, but this isn't > a technical reason, and the point of uniforming a timezone so that it's > easier to compare dates among different changelog is definitely a valid > one.
Is comparing dates of different changelogs a serious usecase? Given that it doesn't neccessarily bear a relation to the date of upload, particularly if a package build is heavily tested before uploading... Upload dates themselves are somewhere else in the system... [EMAIL PROTECTED], or something like that? _That_ should be easy to compare, because it's a single chronological log, formatted like a set of emails. Granted, those are not exactly upload dates... But they're prolly closer to what you think you want to know. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, B.Sc, LPI, MCSE On-hiatus Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive music. -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.1/au/ -----------------------------------------------------------
pgpaAIVf3j35M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
