On Saturday 31 March 2007 10:17, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If this is so important, why, after so many many months of freeze, no Xen > users found this and submited a bug report? (Now its #413601, filed 24 days > ago)
Probably because it's dependent on the order of starting the domU's and the number of domU's. A casual Xen user might not notice such things, and a more intensive Xen user (someone who runs a server with Xen instances) isn't going to reboot often. > > I believe that this fix is worthy of inclusion at this time. > > I disagree. Not only because the bug is not RC, but because you could say > the same for users running other virtualization technologies (UML? Vmware?) > with similar behaviours. Do they behave in the same way? > I'm in favor of adding a note in the Release Notes but I think we should > not delay the release (*again*) by modifying such a critical element as > udev right now. Why would a one-line change delay the release? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://etbe.blogspot.com/ My Blog http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.html Sponsoring Free Software development
