On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 06:51:52AM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:13:47AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:09:12AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > >Russ Allbery wrote: > > > >So, here's a possibly weird proposal. > > > > > > > >What if we had some mechanism whereby people could indicate interest in > > > >maintaining a package should anything happen to the current maintainer? > > > >Have it be as non-confrontational as possible by having it not indicate > > > >any feeling about whether the package is currently maintained well, > > > >just a willingness to help should the current maintainer be unable to > > > >continue for some reason. > > > > an "understudy" or "standby" ? > > > Could we call it "co-maintainer" or something like that?
I understood that term to be already in use with a different meaning ? or do you mean that an additional role is not required :-) Regards, Paddy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
