On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:35:39PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 26, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think that the right thing to do is to assign the persistent names to > > network devices that still exist in the system, but to do nothing with > > any other network devices. That will allow systems to still boot and > > come up properly in the face of network hardware changes. > Think harder about it and you will understand why this cannot be tested > in practice.
Cannot be *tested*? This seems to me to be the right compromise. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]