On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 07:35:39PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 26, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I think that the right thing to do is to assign the persistent names to
> > network devices that still exist in the system, but to do nothing with
> > any other network devices.  That will allow systems to still boot and
> > come up properly in the face of network hardware changes.
> Think harder about it and you will understand why this cannot be tested
> in practice.

Cannot be *tested*?

This seems to me to be the right compromise.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to