Florian Weimer schrieb: > * Maik Merten: > >> <img> gives clear semantics: It's an image. > > Animated GIF, anyone?
Still an image as the usual GIF animations aren't exactly qualifying as true "films". >> <video> gives clear semantics: Video. > > Just because something is labled as "video", it's semantics aren't > suddenly clear. But it's far more specific than <object> and exposes a streamlined API for video usages. Anyway, I guess the "why?" question is better delt with on the whatwg mailing list. Personally I don't really care if it's <object>, <video>, <streamingmedia> or <whatever> as long as the recommended functionality is still implementable in truly free software. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
