On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 19:51:17 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Binary-only NMUs are a necessary evil. The implementation kind of > sucks, but I'm not sure how a better approach would look like. It's > not just the dependencies problem, it's also quite confusing that > you've got a source package which builds different binary package > versions on different architectures (but their are other ways to > achieve that). For instance, this pretty much rules out precise > tracking based on binary packages.
The resulting .changes will get a field like this: Source: bacula (1.38.11-7) which can be used to track back from which source this binary originated. Or are you referring to something different? regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
