Hello
I had wanted to use MSYS to develop for the other platform. Most of my
experience is with WIN32 API, ATL3/COM+ and DirectX on the other platform.
Ron Johnson wrote:
Huh? ActiveX is woven deeply into, and relies upon the Win32 API.
Yes.
1 I want to develop on Linux only. Writing:
a) An Active X for Windows
b) Linux equivalent
c) MacOS equivalent through QT
d) Java applet (for all)
e) Some other platform bits I need not bother you with.
I suppose you might take example from one of the cooperate AV companies
who have an executable for each platform the target.
For more than a decade, Java and JavaScript applets have been able
to run from within the "Netscape" browser.
What exactly do *you* mean by plug-in?
For example a stream client.
I will use Java but I want a backup.
On all platforms it seems possible to write a separate application but
in no real way integrated with the browser.
Obviously I am being a little lazy by asking if anyone has heard of such
a thing so that I can make use of that information however it seemed
sensible since I have looked, not found and will now head for the
development documentation for all browsers as a sensible path.
There are however other ways round which may be more realistic than a
plug in for each browser.
With Windows because of the way programs can be enclosed development
time is reduced a little. If this translates to Linux or perhaps just
per browser that is a benefit.
Realistically these questions should perhaps go to every single browser
mailing list but it seemed sensible to ask here first.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF29I9S9HxQb37XmcRAgrhAJ9ZppmRH96Ia88UlfhTAW3oelcVEwCcDAD1
LeQGxm0FZCNY0XkH03InI8A=
=+TDn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
