On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 05:22:47PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:33:40 +0100, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Are you familiar with the MIA Team work? How is this work > > insufficient that this extra check needs to be implemented? Have you > > tought of a way to integrate the results of your tool into the MIA > > database? > > I think the difference is that the MIA process is too > conservative, and does not require an positive action on the part of > maintainers, and starts with the default that all maintainers are > active. Looking at people who vote for a DPL means that the DD's > have to take an active role in indicating that they are present.
How about using the 'echelon' data already available through http://db.debian.org ? Perhaps it could be extended to record (and display) the last 5 events rather than a single event. We used to have 'maintainer pings', sent by bcwhite iirc. Half of the population hated them, for reasons I never understood. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
