On pe, 2007-02-09 at 20:11 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > I'm askinf if it is ok to to reopen such bugs based of better QA > aspects.
It's a matter of style and taste. Unless you can quote verifiable statistics that using backticks instead of $() is causing problems (that is, bug numbers), let it be. There's real problems to be fixed. (Personally, I prefer $() instead of backticks. Haven't used backticks for a while now.) If you insist going forward with this, then please also file bugs (with patches, preferably) to pre-emptively prevent problems when the wrong programming language is used (C instead of Python, Perl instead of Lisp, Haskell instead of assembler), and also for all packages that are lacking test cases that excercise at least every statement in the code. -- Fundamental truth #2: Attitude is usually more important than skills. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
