Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And everybody gets the SE Linux overhead if he wants or not? Which overhead does SE Linux impose to you?
> The current system does not give you perfect security but neither does > adding SE Linux. Instead, you probably get annoying permission > problems. > Name a few guys that really likes to use this on a private machine and some > real-life improvements that it brings. Hint: "increased security" is not an > argument. I consider "increased security" a very valid argument. The DAC security model is quite outdated now and doesn't really match real world security concerns most workstations are experiencing today! > Not being able to change the cause to the better doesn't mean to > introduce a mess to control the result. And I really hope that Debian > never considers installing+enabling selinux by default. IIRC, debian/etch already does already install selinux today without you even noticing it. > And always think about the problems that you introduce with such things (and > almost all you named have such). I can assure you that the Debian SELinux gurus do. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
