On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:44:39AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, James Troup wrote: > > > Summary > > Credit where credit is due. This is exactly the kind of informative > explanation I have been looking for and I hope we'll see a lot of more of > this sort of thing from the infrastructure teams in the future. > Preferably before the flames start.
Indeed, I have to second this, and state that for the next DPL elections, I will be looking to vote for DPL's that make as part of their campaign platform that Delegates will be appointed or removed based on not just how long they have been working on a task, or how good they are technically, but how well they can communicate with others, and how well they can send out reports and rationals to mailing lists (IRC isn't good enough!) **before** people start to flame and start talking about GR's to replace teams that can't seem to communicate with anyone else. (In fact, I'd prefer work getting delayed by 2-3 hours if that meant getting an adequate report sent out; Lord knows Debian has a whole lost a heck a lot more time than that due to the controversy caused by the buildd restrictions.) So again, I hope we can see a lot more reports like this, and not just in reaction to massive flame-fests on IRC and mailing lists and key individuals taking vacations out of sheer frustration. - Ted -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]