We really need a constant way of dealing with this in package updates. Currently I have two very opposing views, and not entirely convinced in either of them.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/12/msg00279.html vs http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=401258;msg=98 It seems to boil down to: * should packages disable inetd config entries on removal and in preparation for upgrade, and then reenable the entries after upgrade is complete? * what about entries that should be disabled by default? That is the maintainer has decided the majority of users will not need it? * is solving this worthy of etch? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
