On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 04:45:32PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 11:39:13AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > All started with this email: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2006/08/msg00151.html > > > ARM was *in danger*, a lot of stuff (java, xulrunner, mono, ...) were > > not working correctly. People worked hard to fix that, but it was very > > difficult to get packages depending on fixed stuff to get requeued. Also > > a lot of "arch-specific compile errors" were actually due to build > > daemon problems. > > Yes, let's be clear here: ARM was in danger because of a large number of > packages that were *not buildable*, not just because they weren't built. > The call for help was in identifying the reasons for the build failures so > that the underlying problems could be fixed, *not* for hand-building > packages and ignoring the implications for security support.
I feel it's deeper than that: now that aurélien completely stopped to upload non built packages at all (a thing he did on a regular basis before, and just automated with his "rogue" autobuilder) just look at [1], whereas every single arch is keeping up quietly, arm and sparc seem to go to the deepness of hell. I don't know who are the sparc buildd admins, but for sure, the arm port do not seem to be that well. [1] http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-week-big.png -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpQfh48olDgF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
