On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:50:12PM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006, Bill Gatliff wrote: > > > For the faster arches, i.e. the ARM9 machines and above, I'm thinking > > that we should stick with real hardware so there's no question that the > > binaries will run properly. > > Pardon me sir, but can that claim that binaries built on so-called > "real hardware" will unquestionably run (as opposed to, if I understand > correcly, binaries built on an emulated platform) be backed up by any > facts, examples, experimentation results or scientific publication?
Binaries built on real hardware are built on a machine that uses the binaries built on same real hardware. I.e., if it works, at least you're sure it doesn't work because the compiler and the emulator are bug-compatible. -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
