-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx escribió: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:09:13PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: >>>>>> The version I'm building is libtorrent-0.11.0 so I don't think I should >>>>>> call the binary libtorrent10. >>>>> Please check the real soname with objdump -p libtorrent-0.11.0 |grep >>>>> SONAME >>>> The real soname is libtorrent.so.10 >>>> >>>> So, should I name it libtorrent10? >>> Either the soname should be libtorrent.so.11, or you might >>> want to rename libtorrent-0.11.0 to libtorrent-0.10.0 or something. >> I can't that version already pass... > > If the soname is set to libtorrent.so.10, it means applications will > start to look for a file called "/usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10". That will > probably be a symlink in your case to libtorrent-0.11.0, which looks > rather confusing to me. > > In libtorrent9 you have a file called "/usr/lib/libtorrent.so.9". But > there doesn't seem to be a file named libtorrent-0.9.0.so or something, > so I'm a little confused what changed.
No, there's only libtorrent.so.10 libtorrent.so.10.0.0 in my build (libtorrent-0.11.0) I'm more confused since I renamed the package to libtorrent10-rakshasa and libtorrent-rakshasa10 and lintian keeps giving me the warning... Jose - -- ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenode.net #talug #velug #debian-es http://debianvenezuela.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-es #debian-ve CHASLUG -- http://chaslug.org.ve - irc.unplug.org.ve #chaslug San Cristobal - Venezuela. TALUG -- http://linuxtachira.org Fingerprint = 3E7D 4267 AFD5 2407 2A37 20AC 38A0 AD5B CACA B118 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFhsdYOKCtW8rKsRgRAg2iAKCqVE6x7lYUQoSKGvBsUrA4q4kdwgCfVRZ/ SRiDJbmdP0TU7pDbvE1Tbkc= =oOay -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
