[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Dec 14, Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So where do people think the bug lies?
>> - Should libdl be compiled into libnewt.a ?
> Yes.
Is there even a libdl.a?
And what if I have libfoo.a libbar.a libblub.a all using dlopen?
Should they all have it linked in so I get 3 copies of the code?
No, if static libs need other libs the aplication has to link them in
at the end. Likely as a result of *.la files.
>> - Should the static version of libnewt be built differently so as to
>> not call dlopen()?
> Maybe.
That would be an option. But then the static version would have less
features.
>> - if so, any recommendations on how?
> Remove the feature?
>
> --
> ciao,
> Marco
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
