On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 08:51:51AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:05:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote: > >On Nov 30, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> But what about the middle case, i.e. "the behaviour described could be > >> reproduced, but it's not a bug, or at least not our fault"? (Bugzilla > >> calls > >> this "INVALID"). > >I agree that it could be useful, since I get a lot of these cases... > > Why does that matter? You close everything that is not clearly a bug > anyway, immediately. >
You mean so that different people can file the same bug over and over again? Personally, I'd like to see a notabug tag so that you can have a bug still appear on the BTS page but not count (maybe even put the notabug bugs at the top or after the RC bugs). Then people will see them and you can have some sort of explanation attached so that people can see why the maintainer does not consider it a bug. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
