On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 01:58:19 +0100, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Prayer is geared towards large-scale, perhaps even *very* large-scale >installations. It offers speed and low resource usage That's attractive to me. >Changing the appearance is rather hard Like the doctor said: if it hurts, don't do that. >the purpose of Prayer was to fit on top of UW-based mail systems >which really weren't designed to run Webmail. The new mix format mailbox improves UW performance. But in any case, a stateful webmail like prayer will always perform better, no matter what the imap server. >Now, after 5 years, they don't need it anymore. No more releases >are planned. What will they do, then? >Comments are welcome >(It's not that I want to give up, but it's a bit silly to maintain a package >nobody uses.) I've tried many webmail systems, and prayer is my last hope. :-) Why not package it up the way it is, with minimal changes? Maybe a few of us can hack some improvements in, over time.
