"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> It has recently come to my attention that nfs-utils (which is priority
> standard) cannot depend on ucf, since ucf is of priority optional.
>
> I can only see four solutions for this:
>
> a) Ignore the problem for etch, figure out what do to afterwards.
> b) Downgrade nfs-utils' priority (but I don't think this is a very good
> idea).
> c) Rip out the ucf dependency (possible, but far from ideal; using ucf
> instead of regular conffile handling allowed me to close a few bugs,
> at least one of them RC).
> d) Upgrade ucf to priority standard.
>
> I'd personally go with d); would anybody have objections to this? (Cc-ing
> Manoj as the ucf maintainer, even though I'd believe he reads -devel.)
>
> /* Steinar */
e) Test for ucf presence and emulate its behaviour if not.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
