Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about instead of speaking about POSIX, policy should just list the > shells that are officially supported as /bin/sh? There is no need > listing every shell, just a representative subset: bash (obviously), > dash (it's popular) and an other "minimalistic" shell (posh?) to prevent > allowing everything & the kitchen sink if dash starts to rapidly acquire > new features.
You could say the script _should_ be POSIX compliant and _must_ work with bash, dash, ash... Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
