Le 16.10.2006, à 11:48:41, Daniel Schepler a écrit: > On Sunday 15 October 2006 21:48 pm, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > > If you are interested you should also adopt libmal. It causes a problem > > on kpilot and I offered the package to the kpilot maintainer without an > > answer from him. See #389353. > > > > If no one adopt it I will request the removal of malsync from unstable. > > Sorry, I missed that message. I'm not interested in maintaining libmal; it's > just an optional add-on to kpilot. If libmal were removed from unstable, I > would most likely just recompile kdepim with the libmal-dev build-dep cut > out.
OK. What is preferred for a buggy and unmaintained (upstream) package - removal or - orphaning I can orphan libmal but that will not solve #389353 and the QA will not be able to debug it without access to a PDA and an account on http://www.avantgo.com/ The upsteam maintainer can't test it either so I do not see a fast resolution here. > By the way, where did you get the idea that the submitter of #389353 and the > kpilot maintainer were the same person? I'm not "Peter Robin". :) Oops, sorry. Bye, -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Normaliser Unix c'est comme pasteuriser le camembert, L.R. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
