Hi,
> > It will be a fork in the following senses:
> >
> > * no inclusion of trademarked Mozilla artowrk
> > * backporting of security fixes to declared stable version
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to just do the usual .dfsg-dance with the original
> upstream tarball? I still fail to see why we need a fork as a layer
> between upstream and us.
They don't want us to use the name, due to trademark.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
