On Oct 07, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Realistically, most people do not use vacation, finger, and > sharutils either. I have no objections to demoting any of these.
> Are we talking about disk usage? I am not sure > that the increase in disk usage is perceptible on a normal install on > modern (read: made in this millennium) machines. Disk usage of a "no options" default install is still an important parameter. > People on low disk situations can always delete them -- none > of these packages is remotely essential, just remove the policy > package and everything goes. And people who care can always install the thing. If it's too much complex as is then add a metapackage. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
