On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:28:50PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Christian Aichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Maintaining such information somewhere within the library package would > > be possible, but that sounds like a more complex plan, and I doubt that > > many library maintainers know if their lib uses such tricks or not. > does still apply. As a first approximation perhaps libraries with constructors or destructors could be assumed to always be required? That would be more conservative than required but perhaps so conservative as to be useless. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
