> > Sorry. I had a short look at some packages and all redundant > > dependencies were created by shlibdeps. It doesn't seem to make sense to > > have a list by maintainer when the dependencies weren't added by > > him/her. Or did I misunderstand what this discussion is about? > > Yes, I'm afraid you did. The behavior of dpkg-shlibdeps is correct: it > documents the packages that must be present on the system in order for the > binaries to work. The bug we're discussing happens at the ELF linker level > ...
Ah, silly me, I thought the problem was a Depends: entry not a real dependancy. Sorry for the confusion. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
