On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:13:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote: > > I'll take ssss since it hasn't been claimed.
> I claimes it via ITA straight away, perhaps I should have emailed the > list as well sorry. No problem, it was my fault for trusting the mail and not checking. > I'm always happy for co-maintenance, or you can take it yourself. > I imagine it will be easy to maintain. I also maintain another package > by the same author, and he is great to work with. Great. It sounds like you'd be the best choice for it then. I would offer to comaintain, since I think that is generally a good thing, but for a slow-moving package like this I'm not sure that it is required. > I was wondering what the upload ettiquete should be. There is no now, > version, no bugs, and the packaging is fine. Do I try and find a sponsor > just for a change of maintainer, or do I wait until there is something > to do? You could upload now to fix the standards version and to set the new maintainer - thats what I'd do, even though there are no bugs or newer upstream available. Steve -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
