On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 01:40:12PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > * Bill Allombert > > | On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:21:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > | > I do know also that beginning with the dpkg version in etch, the > Conflicts: > | > is no longer required when moving conffiles, it's possible to use > Replaces: > | > by itself. > | > | I wonder if a versioned depend on dpkg can ensure the new dpkg is used > | to handle the package ? > > It can't, since dpkg doesn't re-exec itself.
Does not that depend whether apt special-case dpkg upgrade ? Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]