-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Cai Qian wrote: >> I think it is fine to provide "stardict", so it makes thing easier to share >> dictionaries, right? However, SDCV and stardict have different upstream >> authors >> and release circle, and the latest version is 0.4.2. I suppose it is better >> to >> keep upstream author's naming convention. Any particular reason to rename it? Yap, I thought call it as stardict-console might be easier for our users to find it, But it also looks fine if it listed under stardict virtual package. So let's just keep it in upstream author's naming convention. > - Dump stardic's free dictionary data and package it for stardict, and > might call it 'stardict-xdict-eng-chi' and make it Provides > 'stardict-dictdata'(Closes:#280286, #292908), and make > 'stardict-dictdata' Recommends 'stardict' each other. An update from stardict maintainer Roy Hiu-yeung Chan: yes... notice you, I already create virtual-package named stardict-dictionary few years ago when I start to maintain stardict. And then I take a look at virtual-package-names-list again, I found this: 25 Apr 2004 Added stardict-dictionary Sorry for the mistake, I'd change the title for my wishlist bug on debian-policy. >> Can we use the standard language coding for dictionarie name here, >> such as, >> stardict-xdict-en-zh_CN >> so in the future, we can handle something like, >> stardict-xdict-en_UK-zh_TW Good point. I will take your suggestion for that. >> Thanks. The rest sounds great for me. Thank you for your comments. Best regards, - -Andrew -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE+80gnQYz4bYlCYURAljYAKCGEGfS0itSrZNcwrEIqG3hIXDb+gCfa5vt CaoKsxHyfmiCrpxTu9P0F50= =b8XO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
