On Wednesday 02 August 2006 21:01, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:47:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > > to learn how we deal with this all.
Ok, third time. Please do not do that: To: George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Sending to debian-devel@lists.debian.org is enough, I'm subscribed. Thanks. > > This is fine, but (again) you forget about your 'apt-get source' users, > > which > > NO. They need not care. They can just hack and send me diffs. My > debian/changelog will already document what has been going on anyway. What if I want to be able to revert your patches easily and apply only these which I want to... Then I can start hack on the top of that. > > are not supposed to be aware of your SCM, where your repo is, patches > > applied to the upstream source and why they have been applied. I.e. if > > you have patches, do them debian way (using a debian patch system) even > > using SCM to manage your whole packaging. Your orig.tar.gz must be really > > original tar.gz, and your diff.gz should hold whole debian-specific > > thing. > > I am quite well aware of that and it is trivial to do. Care to describe how without using your SCM but apt-get source instead ? -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
