On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:31:37PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > Right, bzr is great when you have a designed person to integrate > contributor's changes after review. > > But if you have a set of equal developers, bzr can be also used in a > very similar way to Subversion, where all commits go to a central > repository, and nobody has to collect them. It's just a matter of > setting up a directory somewhere with the appropriate write permissions, > and say "This is our canonical archive, the uploader will include what > it's in there, nothing more, nothing less".
I would say that this goes for darcs as well, but even more. Darcs has a nice way of pushing patches via e-mail, with GPG signatures even. These can be processed in an automated way on the server, verified against, for instance, the Debian keyring, and then applied to the repository. I think it would work even nicer. -- John
