On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:27:57 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Saturday 29 July 2006 18:51, Manoj Srivastava wrote: -cut--
>> It could go either way, of course, but I was referring to the
>> difference between due diligence of a group, as opposed to an
>> individual; potentially, a team is only as strong as the weakest
>> link.
> `weakest link' is not always the case for each package release. It
> might happens that only `strongest links' has been involved in a
> package release also.
I am not sure I understand what that last sentence means.
> Furthermore, a single maintainer could also has a `bad day' and
> produce a bad package release. So, I don't believe there is unified
> formula to measure how much a team is being strong, it all boils
> down to have a good communication inside the group. You will hadly
> have a good rollover with a single maintainer..., well except NMUers
> and Hijackers.
I am not sure you have made the thesis that a team is always
to be preferred, to the point of foisting teams on people by force.
manoj
--
"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love."
Albert Einstein
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
